JaredPLNormand's avatar

JaredPLNormand

think beyond the box
92 Watchers536 Deviations
24.1K
Pageviews
See All
MattiaC
GlennThomasi6
EmersonGaete
briamar23
BranislavFabijanic
farzanehlphl
Aillita
NYX-AIM
TokugawaLenari
NourhanB
Psychedelic-Factory
Shyree
lomatic
lightzone
BranislavFabijanic
House-of-Playwrights
Rabiazeeshan
Medium-Format-Photos
TokugawaLenari
NanisKa
daisicalolliwog
edredon
medium-large
MAMIYA-MEDIUM-FORMAT
kingwen
mihailpetkov78
Alshain4

Deviation Spotlight

Artist
  • July 25, 1987
  • United States
  • Deviant for 19 years
  • He / Him
Badges
Albino Llama: Llamas are awesome! (62)
My Bio
Current Residence: Louisiana
Print preference: silver gelatine
Favourite genre of music: ROCK!
Favourite photographer: Richard Avedon
Favourite style of art: experimental
Operating System: Mac
MP3 player of choice: iPhone
Favourite cartoon character: 1990s' Joker
Personal Quote: Think beyond the box

Favourite Visual Artist
Wassily Kandinsky
Favourite Movies
There Will Be Blood
Favourite Bands / Musical Artists
Led Zeppelin
Favourite Writers
Edgar Allan Poe
Favourite Games
The Game. You just lost.
Favourite Gaming Platform
iPhone
Tools of the Trade
Canon 30D, Mamiya RZ67 Pro II, Pentax K1000, Canon AE-1 Program, Canon Rebel 2000
Other Interests
All art and culture
If visual art can be organized into a spectrum, where one end is objectivity and the other nonobjectivity, how far down the line can photography progress toward nonobjective? Can photography show something that is not a thing?  "Each work of art which has an object, a figure, or a part of nature as its theme is objective," according to Arsén Pohribny's Abstract Painting. Therefore, an image of a chair is objective. Nonobjective art depicts no material objects. Jackson Pollock's drippings are nonobjective, as are Mark Rothko's color panels and Wassily Kandinsky's basic shapes and primary colors. Photography is inherently objective. Many
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
If visual art can be organized into a spectrum, where one end is objectivity and the other nonobjectivity, how far down the line can photography progress toward nonobjective? Can photography show something that is not a thing?  "Each work of art which has an object, a figure, or a part of nature as its theme is objective," according to Arsén Pohribny's Abstract Painting. Therefore, an image of a chair is objective. Nonobjective art depicts no material objects. Jackson Pollock's drippings are nonobjective, as are Mark Rothko's color panels and Wassily Kandinsky's basic shapes and primary colors. Photography is inherently objective. Many
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Money, Money, Money By: Jared P. L. Normand "This planet has – or rather had – a problem, which was this: most of the people living on it were unhappy for pretty much of the time. Many solutions were suggested for this problem, but most of these were largely concerned with the movements of small green pieces of paper, which was odd because on the whole it wasn't the small green pieces of paper that were unhappy." -Douglas Adams Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Civilizations revolve around a system of work in exchange for reward, also known as currency or money.  Recently, the mortal sins of greed and envy for money lead the Uni
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In

Profile Comments 268

Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
thanks 4 the welcome, have great things here ;)
Thanks for the fav
Jared--Thanks for the welcome!

Many of my images are produced with a peripheral scanning machine.
youtube video link below

[link]
Would you say you produce your images with a light capturing device and present them largely unedited, with only enhancement of color, crop, and basic presentation?
Yes--color and cropping are my only enhancements--original images are all B&W
If your original images are B&W and you say you enhance color, does that mean you add color?
View all replies
Thank you very much! :)